#002 The Sessions

The Sessions. A wonderful film that's generating a lot of awards buzz at the moment.

It follows the story of Mark O'Brien who, stricken with polio as a boy, has no control over almost all of the muscles in his body, requiring him to live most of his life in an iron lung and at the age of 38, decides that he doesn't want to die a virgin and opts to employ a sex surrogate.

Mark is played by John Hawkes who gave a brilliant performance in the well-accoladed Winter's Bone. And here he give a very nuanced performance, made especially difficult by being restricted in only moving his head but it never becomes an act of self pity and that what I loved about this film. It never made his situation a pitiful thing, only a different one.

Helen Hunt plays the sex therapist Cheryl and give a very.... very revealing performance, but again this movie exceeds expectations in that the sex scenes in this film are not shot romantically at all, they are merely another scene and this is where I give props to director Ben Lewin who shoots most of the film with the camera stuck on a tripod which fully places the audience in perspective of Mark's situation.
There is also a Priest character, played by William H. Macy who provides a lot of the film's unexpected comedic moments that elevate it beyond typical dramas.

This is a very good movie, but by no means my favourite of the year, the ending kind of fizzles but overall I had a very good experience... or session.... (I know that was awful but I had to do it... when I bought my ticket I said "Can i have one to the 2:30 session of The Sessions and then laughed at my own joke.... yeah... I'm that guy)

Solid film with a wonderful (and potential Oscar-worthy) Performance from John Hawkes
8/10

*Sidenote: So evidently this won't be a movie-a-day thing as making your own movie eats your time like Mr. Lecter eats census takers. But I shall try my best to review as often as possible.

No review today either...

Dance rehearsals (my film is a musical) have buggered me out... and I have another whole day of it tomorrow so I need sleep... with that said, goodnight. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Corporate Work

So yet another delay, TRAINSPOTTING is, after all a 2 hour movie and I have rehearsals at 8am tomorrow, I will try to have it up tomorrow night and possibly another film if I can keep my eyes open long enough to watch two. In which case it will be the 2002 film SPUN.

So here's another little nugget with regards to Corporate video work, that is: non-narrative videography. I include weddings, fitness videos, training videos... basically anything that fits in that category, I call Corporate video.

I myself have had a few Corporate gigs and from my experience, the best advice I can give is this:

DO WHAT THE EMPLOYER WANTS.

Yes, that's right, forsake all your "artistic integrity" and, whatever they want, you give it to them. You think it would be more pleasing to the eye to dolly in but they want it handheld? Do it hand held.

Yes 9 times out of 10 your ideas are better but that's not the point of Corporate videos... you have your own work for that kind of experimentation and creative license

At the end of the day, they are the ones paying you. There are hundreds of people out there who want that money and will do what they are asked to do so it's just better to use that handheld shot, that star wipe or that cheesy Muzak, if they are happy, they keep paying you and you can take that money and make your films with it. Simple.

... that seemed like an angry post (not my intention at all) but I guess I've had too many conversations with other people where this seems to be the farthest thing from common sense.... in fact that's a wonderful oxymoron isn't it?.... Common Sense...

#001 Blurred

So first on my movie pile is the 2002 Australian film BLURRED.
It was suggested to me by a friend who recommended it when I was explaining a teen party-esque idea I had and to be honest, I wanted to like this movie more than I actually did.
For anyone that has heard me talk about movies, it will become very quickly apparent that I have a love of multi-plot films, that is films with multiple protagonists (the official term is "Hyperlink Cinema" but that's far too wanktastic for me to ever use that in public). Even the ones that aren't supposed to carry a lot of artistic merit such as VALENTINE'S DAY, I find myself, more often than not, enjoying them in some small way.

But with Blurred, it's just that much more difficult.

Blurred follows a dozen or so characters all on their way to schoolies week on the Gold Coast in sunny Queensland... yeah that's pretty much it.

I must give props to some of the actors here who manage, in some small way, to handle the incredibly on-the-nose dialogue that feels like first, maybe second, draft material rather than something that's been properly re-written. I mean, for example, the first 30 minutes are coated in every piece of Australian slang. Ever. Other actors in this ensemble piece don't fare so well such as the guy on the train who dumps his girlfriend and goes on a high with a random goth character for the entirety of the film.

That's another thing, most of these characters are unfathomably stereotypical to the point where it feels forced and yet those stereotypes aren't taken anywhere new or given a new spin or development throughout the film that would make them interesting. The characters all just kind of sit there and shit happens. There is, to my great dismay, a totally unnecessary love story that seems to come out of nowhere as two of the characters suddenly "Realise we like each other" in order to create conflict, these kinds of developments scream that the writer is taking a hand and only adds to the parts that feel forced.

Don't get me wrong, there were some good moments to this film: there's one particular sequence at a petrol station where several of the stories collide (my favourite kinds of moments in multi-plot films) that was quite enjoyable to watch and the ending wrapped it up nice enough that it didn't feel like my time was completely wasted but at the end of the day, while it wasn't a terrible movie, it wasn't a very good one either.

4.5/10 for me on this one.

P.S. The one amusing thing is how serendipitously creepy Matthew Newton's role is when considering all the things he did later on in life.... but perhaps that's not a particularly good thing...


Next on the pile is TRAINSPOTTING.

Learning From the Pros

Well I am forced to delay the movie review one more day owing to some production-based dilemmas that needed to be solved and my television being occupied, to my utter disgust, with sex and the city.

But I thought I might give away a trade secret... where I'm learning a lot of the filmmaking stuff I use. I learn it from the people I admire. While part of that is ALWAYS inclusive of watching their films, I am actually referring to a distinct advantage in our digital world of websites like youtube where the artists and craftspeople you admire are only a click away.

I can't tell you how many interviews I've since ripped from youtube and kept on hard drives, well over a few hundred gigabytes. From Spielberg to Tarantino, there's plenty of material with some really interesting and useful knowledge imparted to those who go searching.

This is especially evident with every Oscar season when all the "great" directors (except Terrence Malick) will come out to talk a bit about their work and craft.  I stumbled upon this goldmine of information the net has to offer during the 2009/2010 Oscar campaign when nominees included AVATAR, INGLORIOUS BASTERDS and THE HURT LOCKER, and I was merely searching for Tarantino-related videos to satisfy my hunger for every word that man speaks and I came across the Santa Barbara International Film Festival (SBIFF) Directors on directing panel... Basically they put all the talked about directors of the season at a table with each other and have them talk and discuss films for over an hour.
This particular panel had Quentin Tarantino, Kathryn Bigelow, James Cameron, Lee Daniels, Pete Doctor and Todd Philips... it's awe inspiring to say the least.




My only caveat for this video treasure trove is to avoid interviews (aside from some brilliant Hitchcock clips floating about by the AFI) that are shorter than 5 Minutes, usually most of that is a moronic interviewer asking stupid questions ("if you could have any superpower...", when it's a superhero film for a painful example) that add nothing to the conversation, and in my personal experience, the best ones are the interviews and panels that last long enough for the filmmakers to say something truly valuable. So my suggestion is to first search videos longer than 20 min as youtube allows in their advanced search to weed out the less insightful clips.

Hopefully I will be back tomorrow with a short review and the beginning of my "Movie-a-day" feature. I can say, however, that the first on the pile is an Australian film called BLURRED.

Well Look... I'm Back... Again

After nearly 2 Years, in which many a thing has happened, I have decided to return to blogging in the hope that I may eventually get an actual reader or two.

Superlong story short: I am in pre-production on my first Feature film as Director, which is where most of my time has, rather enjoyably, gone.

I was prompted by a friend of mine who decided to go through a massive pile of his unwatched films to do the same and so, I shall be attempting a "Movie-a-Day" kind of thing that shall include all kinds of films whether Home Entertainment, Cinema or otherwise.

I will endeavour  also, to include more blog posts about all things filmmaking that I am picking up along the way of making my film but production-specific updates will be left to the websites set up for that particular production.

More information on my film can be found here: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Carols-An-Arcane-Century-Production/204352042910592

And the youtube that shall soon be filled with Behind the scenes videos is: http://www.youtube.com/user/ArcaneCentury

And fingers crossed I can finally keep this sort of thing going.

Black Swan: ehjkfkledsrlif

Wow. Simply wow. This newest offering from The Wrestler director Darren Aronofsky is a sheer dazzling display of filmmaking. Although I saw it in a cinema with an audience that chose to laugh at inappropriate moments in order to alleviate their uncomfortable feelings that the movie drew out in them.

Black Swan is the story a ballerina who is given the lead in Swan Lake by her boundary pushing director. A rivalry soon ensues when new ballerina in the school played by Mila Kunis enters and creates paranoia in Portman's character. This paranoia soon manifests in grotesque visions and hallucinations involving Swan based imagery and ultimately begins to seep into her reality as she metamorphoses form the innocent White Swan into the seductive and destructive Black Swan.

Aronofsky's direction is top-notch: choosing to shoot more than half the movie in claustrophobic close shots, Aronofsky borrows from Polanski's Repulsion to create a severely agonizing look into the psychotic mind of Nina the Ballerina. Aronofsky is not afraid to go places, using the close-ups on grotesque visions of skin ripping and face stabbing drawing gasps from the audience. It would not be too bold to say that this is his masterpiece.

Portman's performance is nothing but an across the board unanimous verdict of the best of the year. She successfully plays both her doppleganger and herself in such a way that you a truly drawn into the madness that is Nina and cannot help but be fascinated with her from the very first frame, through to the end.

The supporting cast is also great: Mila Kunis as the very straight-played rival ballerina who's "not faking it"; Vincent Cassel as the temperamental Ballet director; Barbara Hershey as the neurotic stage mum and a host of others. Cinematographer Matthew Libatique also give us a nice mix of film and digital with sweeping and sometimes jumpy camera which works especially well during the performance scenes.

Black Swan is nothing short of a masterpiece but I find it very difficult to review this movie. I don't think I've quite gotten my head around it and will probably see it again in the near future, but for now it's a film that has me perpetually fascinated.

A taught, dark, sexy and virtuoso achievement. - 10/10